Adding Value with Eyetracking

1 day workshop. Monday 12th June 2006
UPA 2006. Broomfield, Colorado, USA
www.upassoc.org/conferences_and_events/upa_conference/2006/

Eyetracking is now an almost standard offering from commercial HCI analysts. However, what are the best ways to exploit the strengths and minimise the weaknesses of this technique? This workshop aims to define best practice by sharing ideas and experiences in using eyetracking for evaluation and design of digital interfaces

Update

A big thank you to everyone for a great workshop!

Download the Workshop Highlights presentation here
Download a soft copy of the Workshop posters here

I'm still planning to put up some photos of the day and the dinner

If you have any further feedback about the day please don't hesitate about emailing Tony and myself, we are always looking to improve

cheers,
Natalie and Tony

 

Position Papers

  1. Agnieszka (Aga) Bojko (User Centric, USA)
  2. Kara Pernice Coyne (Nielsen Norman Group, USA)
  3. Giles Colborne (cxpartners, UK)
  4. Andrew Duchowski (Clemson University, USA)
  5. Erika Jönsson (Tobii, Sweden)
  6. Kathi Kaiser (Centralis, USA)
  7. Steve Krug (USA)
  8. Marianne Kroutchkevitch (Shopzilla, USA)
  9. Mark Wehner (Yahoo, USA)
  10. Elizabeth Murphy (US Census Bureau, USA)
  11. Tony Renshaw (Leeds Metropolitan University, UK)
  12. Andrew Schall (UserWorks Inc. & the University of Baltimore, USA)
  13. Natalie Webb (Amberlight Partners, UK)
  14. Cristin Witcher (Accenture, USA)
  15. Nico Vroom & Erik Hooft (Tobii, Sweden)

Click here for an outline of the day

 

Adding Value with Eyetracking

Workshop Facilitators

Natalie Webb
Amberlight Partners Ltd, 58 Bloomsbury St. London WC1B 3QT, UK.
Natalie@amber-light.co.uk

Tony Renshaw

Leeds Metropolitan University, School of Computing, Beckett Park, Leeds, LSQ 3QS, UK.
T.Renshaw@leedsmet.ac.uk

 

Applicant position papers for workshop
The facilitators aim to select participants (practitioners and academics) who have experience in using eyetracking or, if little experience, have developed a position or view on the use of eyetracking for commercial reasons. The workshop is not a tutorial and attendees need to be able to actively participate in the discussions

The position papers submitted need to address the following questions:

Please provide your position paper in a Word or RTF document of no more than 2 pages and send to the workshop facilitators emails listed above.

The final deadline for position papers is the 2nd June. We will however endeavor to review and provide feedback on workshop position papers no later than 2 weeks after they are submitted to us (or the 9th June whichever is earliest). If you need to get feedback in a shorter time-frame than this, please let us know.

Our backgrounds in eye tracking for design and evaluation
Tony gained his PhD in Human Computer Interaction at Leeds Metropolitan University. His research topic was entitled 'Designing for Visual Influence' and featured the use of eye tracking to explore the nature of eye movements over various visual display designs. Tony is now part of a team, headed by Professor Janet Finlay, set up within the university which offers usability evaluations of web sites and software applications to a variety of customers both large and small.

Natalie is a HCI consultant in London. She has experience with requirements gathering, design and evaluation across several platforms such as web, mobile phone and software for both small and large clients. She has experience in several eyetracking projects for commercial clients within the web domain

Both Tony and Natalie have conducted a workshop on eyetracking at British HCI 2005 and will be facilitating a workshop at CHI 2006.

Our current work and interest in the field
Eyetracking has been around for a number of years and its popularity has steadily grown as a commercially available service for User Centered Design (UCD). However, questions remain how best to maximise the use of this technique both in terms of exploiting its power and being aware of its limitations.

Natalie is specifically interested in using eyetracking within a commercial arena. Questions that interest her are how to frame the right questions and do the right research for clients. She is also interested in issues of good study design and doing manageable data analysis within commercial timeframes

Tony is particularly interested in exploring the use of eye tracking data and eye movement metrics as a means of providing quantitative measures of user satisfaction; an element of usability hitherto measured qualitatively. His research indicates there may be a relationship between peoples' feelings of satisfaction and certain eye movement characteristics. Tony is also interested in the practical application of eye tracking in evaluations conducted as part of the UCD process in practice.

Critical issues
There are a number of commercial issues ranging from scientific to practical that we would like to address within the workshop:

Further reading and references